Sferrazza v. Arcade Cleaning Contractors, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sferrazza v. Arcade Cleaning Contractors, Inc.

296 A.D.2d 338, 744 N.Y.S.2d 673, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7374

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 11, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 296 A.D.2d 338 (Sferrazza v. Arcade Cleaning Contractors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sferrazza v. Arcade Cleaning Contractors, Inc., 296 A.D.2d 338, 744 N.Y.S.2d 673, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7374 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis York, J.), entered on or about June 6, 2001, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained when plaintiff slipped and fell at her place of business, granted defendant cleaning contractor’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion was properly granted in the absence of any evidence that defendant either created or had actual or constructive notice of the wet spot which allegedly caused plaintiffs harm (see, Segretti v Shorenstein Co., 256 AD2d 234; DiBenedetto v Port Auth., 293 AD2d 399). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis York, J.), entered on or about June 6, 2001, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained when plaintiff slipped and fell at her place of business, granted defendant cleaning contractor’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion was properly granted in the absence of any evidence that defendant either created or had actual or constructive notice of the wet spot which allegedly caused plaintiffs harm (see, Segretti v Shorenstein Co., 256 AD2d 234; DiBenedetto v Port Auth., 293 AD2d 399). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

296 A.D.2d 338, 744 N.Y.S.2d 673, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sferrazza-v-arcade-cleaning-contractors-inc-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack