Seyun Kim v. Loretta E. Lynch

617 F. App'x 789
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 23, 2015
Docket09-73640
StatusUnpublished

This text of 617 F. App'x 789 (Seyun Kim v. Loretta E. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seyun Kim v. Loretta E. Lynch, 617 F. App'x 789 (9th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Seyun Kim, a native and citizen of South Korea, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals decision dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal. We deny the petition for review. “[FJorced conscription or punishment for evasion of military duty generally does not constitute persecution on account of a protected ground.” Movsisian v. Ashcroft, 395 F.3d 1095, 1097 (9th Cir.2005). Kim has presented no “evidence that [he] would be singled out for severe disproportionate punishment for refusing to serve in the [South Korean] military.” Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1188 (9th Cir.2006); cf. id. at 1187 (citing cases involving examples of severe disproportionate punishment).

DENIED.

***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
617 F. App'x 789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seyun-kim-v-loretta-e-lynch-ca9-2015.