Seyun Kim v. Loretta E. Lynch

617 F. App'x 789
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 23, 2015·No. 09-73640·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Seyun Kim, a native and citizen of South Korea, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals decision dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal. We deny the petition for review. “[FJorced conscription or punishment for evasion of military duty generally does not constitute persecution on account of a protected ground.” Movsisian v. Ashcroft, 395 F.3d 1095, 1097 (9th Cir.2005). Kim has presented no “evidence that [he] would be singled out for severe disproportionate punishment for refusing to serve in the [South Korean] military.” Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1188 (9th Cir.2006); cf. id. at 1187 (citing cases involving examples of severe disproportionate punishment).

DENIED.

***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seyun Kim v. Loretta E. Lynch, 617 F. App'x 789 (9th Cir. 2015).

617 F. App'x 789 (Seyun Kim v. Loretta E. Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related