Seymour v. Wood

63 Cal. 81, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 364
California Supreme Court·Decided January 26, 1883·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The court below dismissed this cause on motion of defendants for want of prosecution, and on a further motion set aside the order of dismissal. An appeal is prosecuted from the last mentioned order. The ruling of the Superior Court was liberal, but we cannot see that it abused its discretion in vacating the order of dismissal. A motion to set aside an order of dismissal is addressed to the sound discretion of the Superior Court, and this court is disposed to sustain the ruling of the court below, unless there is a clear and manifest abuse of discretion. No such clear and manifest abuse exists here, and the order must be affirmed.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seymour v. Wood, 63 Cal. 81, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 364 (Cal. 1883).

63 Cal. 81 (Seymour v. Wood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taecker v. Parker
93 P.2d 197 (California Court of Appeal, 1939)
Grass v. Rindge Co.
258 P. 673 (California Court of Appeal, 1927)
Startzman v. Los Banos Cotton Gins, Inc.
256 P. 220 (California Court of Appeal, 1927)
Estate of Chavier v. Estate of Giráldez
15 P.R. 145 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1909)
Moore v. Thompson
70 P. 930 (California Supreme Court, 1902)