Seymour v. Tradesmen's Trust & Saving Fund Co.
52 A. 125, 203 Pa. 151, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 674
Opinion
By the terms of the policy the trust company was entitled to subrogation to all the rights and remedies of the insured. As the plaintiffs, by voluntarily conveying the properties to the owner of the first mortgage put it out of their power to comply with their agreement, they were not entitled to recover.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Seymour v. Tradesmen's Trust & Saving Fund Co., 52 A. 125, 203 Pa. 151, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 674 (Pa. 1902).
52 A. 125 (Seymour v. Tradesmen's Trust & Saving Fund Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives & Granting Annuities v. Central Trust & Savings Co.
99 A. 910 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)
Central Trust & Savings Co. v. Henry Kraan Furniture Co.
57 Pa. Super. 221 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)
Wheeler v. Equitable Trust Co.
55 A. 1065 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1903)