Seymour v. Lusby
This text of Seymour v. Lusby (Seymour v. Lusby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6237
EDWARD THOMAS SEYMOUR, III,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROBERT LUSBY; LARRY WELCH, Administration; CAPTAIN PARRIN, Calvert County Detention Center,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-1137-1-MJG)
Submitted: May 13, 2004 Decided: May 19, 2004
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Thomas Seymour, III, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Breads, Jr., LOCAL GOVERNMENT INSURANCE TRUST, Columbia, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Edward Thomas Seymour, III, appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Seymour v. Lusby, No. CA-03-1137-1-MJG (D. Md. Jan. 14,
2004). We deny Seymour’s motions to file a formal brief, for oral
argument, and for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Seymour v. Lusby, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seymour-v-lusby-ca4-2004.