Seymour v. Jerome

Michigan Court of Chancery

Seymour v. Jerome

1 Walk. Ch. 356

DecidedFebruary 15, 1844

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Walk. Ch. 356 (Seymour v. Jerome) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seymour v. Jerome, 1 Walk. Ch. 356 (Mich. Ct. App. 1844).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancellor.

The interlocutory decree, or order, was entered by consent of parties. It admits the partnership, and the right of complainant to an account of the partnership dealings. To that extent it is an adjudication on the rights of the parties. A complainant may, at any time before there has been an interlocutory or final decree in a cause, dismiss his bill of course, on the payment of costs. This is the general rule, but the present application does not come within it.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancellor.

The interlocutory decree, or order, was entered by consent of parties. It admits the partnership, and the right of complainant to an account of the partnership dealings. To that extent it is an adjudication on the rights of the parties. A complainant may, at any time before there has been an interlocutory or final decree in a cause, dismiss his bill of course, on the payment of costs. This is the general rule, but the present application does not come within it.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Walk. Ch. 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seymour-v-jerome-michchanct-1844.