Seymour v. Goodwin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Seymour v. Goodwin

72 A. 123, 74 N.J. Eq. 856, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 292

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Seymour v. Goodwin. Read the opinion of the Court — 69 N.J. Eq. 833 →

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 16, 1908·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It has previously been decided that the -bill of complaint herein sets up a good cause of action. Seymour v. Goodwin, 68 N. J. Eq. (2 Robb.) 189; 69 N. J. Eq. (3 Robb.) 833. The cause came on to final hearing before Vice-Chancellor Stevens, who held that the material allegations of the bill were sustained by the evidence, and thereupon advised a final decree for the complainant. We agree with his conclusions, -and the decree should therefore be affirmed, with costs.

[857]*857For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Bergen, Yoorhees, 'Min-turn, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yroom, Green, Grai, Dill —15. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It has previously been decided that the -bill of complaint herein sets up a good cause of action. Seymour v. Goodwin, 68 N. J. Eq. (2 Robb.) 189; 69 N. J. Eq. (3 Robb.) 833. The cause came on to final hearing before Vice-Chancellor Stevens, who held that the material allegations of the bill were sustained by the evidence, and thereupon advised a final decree for the complainant. We agree with his conclusions, -and the decree should therefore be affirmed, with costs.

[857]*857For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Bergen, Yoorhees, 'Min-turn, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yroom, Green, Grai, Dill —15. For reversal — None.

Seymour v. Goodwin, 72 A. 123, 74 N.J. Eq. 856, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 292 (N.J. 1908).

Pincite

72 A. 123 (Seymour v. Goodwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.