Seymour v. Goodwin

72 A. 123, 74 N.J. Eq. 856, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 292
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 16, 1908
StatusPublished

This text of 72 A. 123 (Seymour v. Goodwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seymour v. Goodwin, 72 A. 123, 74 N.J. Eq. 856, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 292 (N.J. 1908).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It has previously been decided that the -bill of complaint herein sets up a good cause of action. Seymour v. Goodwin, 68 N. J. Eq. (2 Robb.) 189; 69 N. J. Eq. (3 Robb.) 833. The cause came on to final hearing before Vice-Chancellor Stevens, who held that the material allegations of the bill were sustained by the evidence, and thereupon advised a final decree for the complainant. We agree with his conclusions, -and the decree should therefore be affirmed, with costs.

[857]*857For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Bergen, Yoorhees, 'Min-turn, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yroom, Green, Grai, Dill —15. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 A. 123, 74 N.J. Eq. 856, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seymour-v-goodwin-nj-1908.