Seymour v. Freer

72 U.S. 822, 18 L. Ed. 564, 5 Wall. 822, 1866 U.S. LEXIS 984
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 26, 1867·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinion

72 U.S. 822 (____)
5 Wall. 822

SEYMOUR
v.
FREER.

Supreme Court of United States.

The CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the court.

We think that for the purposes of appeal this decree must be regarded as having been passed on the 20th, and that the bond was filed in time.

But if this were otherwise, and through mistake or accident no bond, or a defective bond, had been filed, this court would not dismiss the appeal, except on failure to comply with an order to give the proper security within such reasonable time as it might prescribe.[*] What is essential to an *823 appeal is allowance, citation to the appellees, or equivalent notice or waiver, and the bringing up of the record at the next term of this court. Security for prosecution should be taken by the judge on signing the citation; but if this duty be omitted or defectively performed, a remedy can be applied here on motion.

In the present case a bond, admitted to be sufficient for costs of prosecution, whether given in time to make appeal operate as a supersedeas or not, was filed in the court below before removal to this court.

The motion to dismiss the appeal must therefore be

DENIED.

NOTES

[*] Brobst v. Brobst, 2 Wallace, 96.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seymour v. Freer, 72 U.S. 822, 18 L. Ed. 564, 5 Wall. 822, 1866 U.S. LEXIS 984 (1867).

72 U.S. 822 (Seymour v. Freer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richards v. United States
192 F.2d 602 (D.C. Circuit, 1951)
United States v. Moore Et Ux
182 F.2d 336 (Fifth Circuit, 1950)
Coppard v. Atascosa County State Bank of Jourdanton
56 F.2d 1023 (Fifth Circuit, 1932)
In Re Hurley Mercantile Co.
56 F.2d 1023 (Fifth Circuit, 1932)
Hostetter v. Symes
10 F.2d 109 (Eighth Circuit, 1925)
Corcoran v. Kostrometinoff
164 F. 685 (Ninth Circuit, 1908)
Blaffer v. New Orleans Water Supply Co.
160 F. 389 (Fifth Circuit, 1908)
United States ex rel. Mulvihill v. Clabaugh
21 App. D.C. 440 (D.C. Circuit, 1903)
Walker v. Houghteling
104 F. 513 (Seventh Circuit, 1900)
The Presto
93 F. 522 (Fifth Circuit, 1899)
Green v. City of Lynn
87 F. 839 (First Circuit, 1898)
Schenck v. Diamond Match Co.
73 F. 22 (Third Circuit, 1896)
Vaill v. Town Council
28 A. 344 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1893)
Peugh v. Davis
110 U.S. 227 (Supreme Court, 1884)
O'Reilly v. Edrington
96 U.S. 724 (Supreme Court, 1878)