Seymour v. Freer
This text of 72 U.S. 822 (Seymour v. Freer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SEYMOUR
v.
FREER.
Supreme Court of United States.
The CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the court.
We think that for the purposes of appeal this decree must be regarded as having been passed on the 20th, and that the bond was filed in time.
But if this were otherwise, and through mistake or accident no bond, or a defective bond, had been filed, this court would not dismiss the appeal, except on failure to comply with an order to give the proper security within such reasonable time as it might prescribe.[*] What is essential to an *823 appeal is allowance, citation to the appellees, or equivalent notice or waiver, and the bringing up of the record at the next term of this court. Security for prosecution should be taken by the judge on signing the citation; but if this duty be omitted or defectively performed, a remedy can be applied here on motion.
In the present case a bond, admitted to be sufficient for costs of prosecution, whether given in time to make appeal operate as a supersedeas or not, was filed in the court below before removal to this court.
The motion to dismiss the appeal must therefore be
DENIED.
NOTES
[*] Brobst v. Brobst, 2 Wallace, 96.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 U.S. 822, 18 L. Ed. 564, 5 Wall. 822, 1866 U.S. LEXIS 984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seymour-v-freer-scotus-1867.