Seymour v. Feigl

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Seymour v. Feigl

56 Misc. 439, 107 N.Y.S. 94

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1907

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 56 Misc. 439 (Seymour v. Feigl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seymour v. Feigl, 56 Misc. 439, 107 N.Y.S. 94 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant appeals from an order denying his motion to modify a judgment entered against him in the Municipal Court. The judgment so taken was rendered upon an inquest, the defendant being in default at the time of the-trial. Subsequently the defendant made a motion to oj>en his default which was denied and, so far as appears, no appeal has been taken from such order; therefore, the present appeal cannot be entertained.

Present: Gildersleeve, Leventritt and Erlanger, JJ.

Appeal dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant appeals from an order denying his motion to modify a judgment entered against him in the Municipal Court. The judgment so taken was rendered upon an inquest, the defendant being in default at the time of the-trial. Subsequently the defendant made a motion to oj>en his default which was denied and, so far as appears, no appeal has been taken from such order; therefore, the present appeal cannot be entertained.

Present: Gildersleeve, Leventritt and Erlanger, JJ.

Appeal dismissed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 Misc. 439, 107 N.Y.S. 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seymour-v-feigl-nyappterm-1907.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack