Seymour v. Feigl

56 Misc. 439, 107 N.Y.S. 94
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 15, 1907·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant appeals from an order denying his motion to modify a judgment entered against him in the Municipal Court. The judgment so taken was rendered upon an inquest, the defendant being in default at the time of the-trial. Subsequently the defendant made a motion to oj>en his default which was denied and, so far as appears, no appeal has been taken from such order; therefore, the present appeal cannot be entertained.

Present: Gildersleeve, Leventritt and Erlanger, JJ.

Appeal dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seymour v. Feigl, 56 Misc. 439, 107 N.Y.S. 94 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

56 Misc. 439 (Seymour v. Feigl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schallock v. Wood
89 Misc. 436 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)