Seymour v. Daniel

23 S.E. 37, 97 Ga. 328
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 29, 1895·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

Most of the numerous grounds of the motion for a new trial fail entirely to plainly and distinctly set forth the errors complained of, but on the contrary, are too vague, con- . fused, indefinite and unintelligible for consideration by this, court; in none of the grounds does it appear that any error requiring a new trial was committed; the evidence was sufficient to warrant the verdict, and it having been approved by the trial judge, this court will not set it aside.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seymour v. Daniel, 23 S.E. 37, 97 Ga. 328 (Ga. 1895).

23 S.E. 37 (Seymour v. Daniel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stamps v. Tisinger
165 S.E. 18 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)