Seymour v. Daniel

Supreme Court of Georgia

Seymour v. Daniel

23 S.E. 37, 97 Ga. 328

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJuly 29, 1895

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 S.E. 37 (Seymour v. Daniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seymour v. Daniel, 23 S.E. 37, 97 Ga. 328 (Ga. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

Most of the numerous grounds of the motion for a new trial fail entirely to plainly and distinctly set forth the errors complained of, but on the contrary, are too vague, con- . fused, indefinite and unintelligible for consideration by this, court; in none of the grounds does it appear that any error requiring a new trial was committed; the evidence was sufficient to warrant the verdict, and it having been approved by the trial judge, this court will not set it aside.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simmons, C. J.

Most of the numerous grounds of the motion for a new trial fail entirely to plainly and distinctly set forth the errors complained of, but on the contrary, are too vague, con- . fused, indefinite and unintelligible for consideration by this, court; in none of the grounds does it appear that any error requiring a new trial was committed; the evidence was sufficient to warrant the verdict, and it having been approved by the trial judge, this court will not set it aside.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 S.E. 37, 97 Ga. 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seymour-v-daniel-ga-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack