Seymour v. Carcia

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Seymour v. Carcia

593 A.2d 130, 219 Conn. 903, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 302

DecidedMay 17, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 593 A.2d 130 (Seymour v. Carcia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seymour v. Carcia, 593 A.2d 130, 219 Conn. 903, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 302 (Colo. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 24 Conn. App. 446, is granted, limited to the following issue:

Philip J. O’Connor, in support of the petition. Kathryn Calibey, in opposition. Decided May 17, 1991

“Was the Appellate Court correct in determining that the plaintiff introduced sufficient evidence to support the jury’s award of future economic loss?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 24 Conn. App. 446, is granted, limited to the following issue:

Philip J. O’Connor, in support of the petition. Kathryn Calibey, in opposition. Decided May 17, 1991

“Was the Appellate Court correct in determining that the plaintiff introduced sufficient evidence to support the jury’s award of future economic loss?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

593 A.2d 130, 219 Conn. 903, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seymour-v-carcia-conn-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack