Seymour v. Basham

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 19, 2004
Docket04-6140
StatusUnpublished

This text of Seymour v. Basham (Seymour v. Basham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seymour v. Basham, (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6140

EDWARD THOMAS SEYMOUR, III,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DEPUTY BASHAM; DEPUTY BOTTELER; JOHN A. BARTLETT, JR., Calvert County Sheriff; R. A. FIGUERIS, Deputy, Badge #1215; A. C. MOSCHETTO, Deputy, Badge #4341; CALVERT COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE; DEPUTYS NAME IN STATEMENT; DEPUTYS DEPICTED BUT UNKNOWN,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

LISA RIDGE, Assistant States Attorney; SHEILA SULLIVAN, Assistant Public Defender; UNKNOWN PARTICIPATING OFFICERS IN A & B ARREST,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-1009-1-MJG; CA-03-1138-1-MJG)

Submitted: March 11, 2004 Decided: March 19, 2004

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Thomas Seymour, III, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Breads, Jr., LOCAL GOVERNMENT INSURANCE TRUST, Columbia, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Edward Thomas Seymour, III appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Seymour

v. Basham, Nos. CA-03-1009-1-MJG; CA-03-1138-1-MJG (D. Md. filed

Dec. 23, 2003 & entered Dec. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Seymour v. Basham, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seymour-v-basham-ca4-2004.