Seymour v. Basham

Fourth Circuit

Seymour v. Basham

90 F. App'x 50

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 19, 2004·No. No. 04-6140·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Edward Thomas Seymour, III appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Seymour v. Basham, Nos. CA-03-1009-1-MJG; CA-03-1138-1-MJG (D.Md. filed Dec. 23, 2003 & entered Dec. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Edward Thomas Seymour, III appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Seymour v. Basham, Nos. CA-03-1009-1-MJG; CA-03-1138-1-MJG (D.Md. filed Dec. 23, 2003 & entered Dec. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Seymour v. Basham, 90 F. App'x 50 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

90 F. App'x 50 (Seymour v. Basham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related