Seymour-Heath v. United States
This text of 417 F.2d 979 (Seymour-Heath v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The above matter having been duly considered after oral argument, and an examination of the briefs on file, the judgment of the district court affirming an order of a referee in bankruptcy holding that the United States Tax Court had exclusive jurisdiction to review any final order of the Renegotiation Board, is affirmed. Sec. 403(e) of the Renegotiations Act; 50 U.S.C.App. § 1191 (e) (1). Rushlight v. United States, 259 F.2d 658, 659 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 952, 79 S.Ct. 738, 3 L.Ed.2d 760 (1959); Bass v. United States, 221 F.2d 494 (8th Cir.,), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 827, 76 S.Ct. 56, 100 L.Ed. 738.
The fact that bankruptcy intervened in the present case does not change our conclusion. United States v. Paddock, 178 F.2d 394 (5th Cir. 1949), idem, 180 F.2d 121, 123 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 813, 71 S.Ct. 41, 95 L.Ed. 597 (1950).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
417 F.2d 979, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 5000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seymour-heath-v-united-states-ca9-1968.