Seymour Berman, Ralph Cohen and Hattie Robinson v. Stanley Plotkin, and Third-Party (Ralph Cohen, Third-Party Appellee)

271 F.2d 416
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedNovember 12, 1959
Docket12938_1
StatusPublished

This text of 271 F.2d 416 (Seymour Berman, Ralph Cohen and Hattie Robinson v. Stanley Plotkin, and Third-Party (Ralph Cohen, Third-Party Appellee)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seymour Berman, Ralph Cohen and Hattie Robinson v. Stanley Plotkin, and Third-Party (Ralph Cohen, Third-Party Appellee), 271 F.2d 416 (3d Cir. 1959).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with Judge Clary, 172 F. Supp. 214, in the district court that by the terms of the general release executed by the defendant and third-party plaintiff (no question of fraud, accident or mistake involved) to the third-party defendant, he effectively relinquished his right to claim contribution from the third-party defendant for injuries sustained by third-parties in the same accident. Killian v. Catanese, 1954, 375 Pa. 593, 101 A.2d 379.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Killian v. Catanese
101 A.2d 379 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1954)
Berman v. Plotkin
172 F. Supp. 214 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 F.2d 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seymour-berman-ralph-cohen-and-hattie-robinson-v-stanley-plotkin-and-ca3-1959.