Seymore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Seymore v. State

659 So. 2d 721, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9323, 1995 WL 518813

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Seymore v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 693 So. 2d 647 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 5, 1995·No. No. 95-427·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an order denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because appellant has a belated direct appeal of his conviction and sentence pending in this court (Case No. 94-3847), we affirm the denial of relief pursuant to rule 3.850, without prejudice to appellant’s right again to file such a motion in the trial court should his direct appeal prove unsuccessful.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an order denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because appellant has a belated direct appeal of his conviction and sentence pending in this court (Case No. 94-3847), we affirm the denial of relief pursuant to rule 3.850, without prejudice to appellant’s right again to file such a motion in the trial court should his direct appeal prove unsuccessful.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Seymore v. State, 659 So. 2d 721, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9323, 1995 WL 518813 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

659 So. 2d 721 (Seymore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.