Seymore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Seymore v. State

541 So. 2d 798, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1032, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2165, 1989 WL 39573

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 26, 1989

DocketNo. 88-0716

StatusPublished

This text of 541 So. 2d 798 (Seymore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seymore v. State, 541 So. 2d 798, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1032, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2165, 1989 WL 39573 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction but remand for resentencing. The state concedes that the sentencing guidelines scoresheet [799]*799was incorrectly scored so to reflect one of appellant’s previous convictions at a score twelve points higher than mandated. The error resulted in appellant being placed in a higher sentencing category. Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing with a corrected scoresheet.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction but remand for resentencing. The state concedes that the sentencing guidelines scoresheet [799]*799was incorrectly scored so to reflect one of appellant’s previous convictions at a score twelve points higher than mandated. The error resulted in appellant being placed in a higher sentencing category. Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing with a corrected scoresheet.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

541 So. 2d 798, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1032, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2165, 1989 WL 39573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seymore-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.