Seymer v. Town of Columbia Falls

Montana Supreme Court

Seymer v. Town of Columbia Falls

303 P.2d 942, 130 Mont. 632, 1956 Mont. LEXIS 63

Montana Supreme Court·Decided November 21, 1956·No. No. 9732·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Pursuant to written stipulation executed by James A. Cumming, counsel for the appellant Chet Seymer, Trustee, and the law firm of Murphy and Robinson by C. S. Robinson, counsel for defendants and respondents Joe Monegan and Gerald Monegan, it is ordered that this appeal be, and it is dismissed with prejudice to the appellant Chet Seymer, Trustee, and it is further ordered that each of the parties hereto shall pay their own costs incurred on the appeal and that the cash deposit of the appellant Chet Seymer, Trustee, made in lieu of an undertaking on appeal may be released and refunded to said appellant, Chet Seymer, Trustee.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE ADAIR, and MR. JUSTICES ANGSTMAN, ANDERSON, DAVIS, and BOTTOMLY, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Pursuant to written stipulation executed by James A. Cumming, counsel for the appellant Chet Seymer, Trustee, and the law firm of Murphy and Robinson by C. S. Robinson, counsel for defendants and respondents Joe Monegan and Gerald Monegan, it is ordered that this appeal be, and it is dismissed with prejudice to the appellant Chet Seymer, Trustee, and it is further ordered that each of the parties hereto shall pay their own costs incurred on the appeal and that the cash deposit of the appellant Chet Seymer, Trustee, made in lieu of an undertaking on appeal may be released and refunded to said appellant, Chet Seymer, Trustee.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE ADAIR, and MR. JUSTICES ANGSTMAN, ANDERSON, DAVIS, and BOTTOMLY, concur.

Seymer v. Town of Columbia Falls, 303 P.2d 942, 130 Mont. 632, 1956 Mont. LEXIS 63 (Mo. 1956).

Pincite

303 P.2d 942 (Seymer v. Town of Columbia Falls) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.