Seymer v. Town of Columbia Falls

Montana Supreme Court

Seymer v. Town of Columbia Falls

303 P.2d 942, 130 Mont. 632, 1956 Mont. LEXIS 63

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 21, 1956

DocketNo. 9732

StatusPublished

This text of 303 P.2d 942 (Seymer v. Town of Columbia Falls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seymer v. Town of Columbia Falls, 303 P.2d 942, 130 Mont. 632, 1956 Mont. LEXIS 63 (Mo. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Pursuant to written stipulation executed by James A. Cumming, counsel for the appellant Chet Seymer, Trustee, and the law firm of Murphy and Robinson by C. S. Robinson, counsel for defendants and respondents Joe Monegan and Gerald Monegan, it is ordered that this appeal be, and it is dismissed with prejudice to the appellant Chet Seymer, Trustee, and it is further ordered that each of the parties hereto shall pay their own costs incurred on the appeal and that the cash deposit of the appellant Chet Seymer, Trustee, made in lieu of an undertaking on appeal may be released and refunded to said appellant, Chet Seymer, Trustee.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE ADAIR, and MR. JUSTICES ANGSTMAN, ANDERSON, DAVIS, and BOTTOMLY, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Pursuant to written stipulation executed by James A. Cumming, counsel for the appellant Chet Seymer, Trustee, and the law firm of Murphy and Robinson by C. S. Robinson, counsel for defendants and respondents Joe Monegan and Gerald Monegan, it is ordered that this appeal be, and it is dismissed with prejudice to the appellant Chet Seymer, Trustee, and it is further ordered that each of the parties hereto shall pay their own costs incurred on the appeal and that the cash deposit of the appellant Chet Seymer, Trustee, made in lieu of an undertaking on appeal may be released and refunded to said appellant, Chet Seymer, Trustee.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE ADAIR, and MR. JUSTICES ANGSTMAN, ANDERSON, DAVIS, and BOTTOMLY, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 P.2d 942, 130 Mont. 632, 1956 Mont. LEXIS 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seymer-v-town-of-columbia-falls-mont-1956.