Seybolt v. Southworth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Seybolt v. Southworth

241 A.D. 637

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 241 A.D. 637 (Seybolt v. Southworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seybolt v. Southworth, 241 A.D. 637 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment in favor of plaintiff reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and judgment in favor of defendant, appellant, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint and for $100.31, with interest from September 1, 1932, granted, with costs. The court reverses the fifth finding of fact contained in the decision and adopts the findings made by the referee at the request of defendant, appellant, and further makes the findings requested by the defendant, appellant, but which were refused by the referee. Opinion by Hill, P. J. (which is not to be published because not of general interest). Crapser and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Rhodes, J., dissents, with a memorandum (which is not to be published because not of general interest), in which Bliss, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment in favor of plaintiff reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and judgment in favor of defendant, appellant, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint and for $100.31, with interest from September 1, 1932, granted, with costs. The court reverses the fifth finding of fact contained in the decision and adopts the findings made by the referee at the request of defendant, appellant, and further makes the findings requested by the defendant, appellant, but which were refused by the referee. Opinion by Hill, P. J. (which is not to be published because not of general interest). Crapser and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Rhodes, J., dissents, with a memorandum (which is not to be published because not of general interest), in which Bliss, J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 A.D. 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seybolt-v-southworth-nyappdiv-1934.