Sexton v. Thompson

New Mexico Court of Appeals·Decided July 8, 2010·No. 30,244·Unpublished

Opinion

1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 5 not include the filing date.

8 Plaintiff-Appellant,

9 v. No. 30,244

11 EVERETT and RUSSELL

13 Defendants-Appellees.

15 Sheri A. Raphaelson, District Judge

16 Kathleen Kentish Lucero 17 D. Scott Riedel 18 Espanola, NM

19 for Appellant

20 Martin M. Martinez 21 Espanola, NM

22 for Appellee Shirley Thompson Everett

24 SUTIN, Judge. 1 Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has

3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

6 ________________________________ 7 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 ______________________________ 10 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge

11 ______________________________ 12 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sexton v. Thompson, (N.M. Ct. App. 2010).

Sexton v. Thompson (Sexton v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.