Sexton v. State
This text of 190 S.W.3d 401 (Sexton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
John D. Sexton, acting pro se, appeals from an order entered by the Circuit Court of Jackson County denying his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief or, in the alternative, for declaratory judgment. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value; however, a memorandum explaining the reasoning for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 S.W.3d 401, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 174, 2006 WL 385639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sexton-v-state-moctapp-2006.