Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Sexton v. State

Sexton v. State

853 So. 2d 1102, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12802, 2003 WL 22014706
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 27, 2003
DocketNo. 4D02-3089
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 853 So. 2d 1102 (Sexton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sexton v. State, 853 So. 2d 1102, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12802, 2003 WL 22014706 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Larry Sexton timely appeals from his June 28, 2002 resentencing, which effectively denied his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm. Sexton expressly waived all postconviction challenges in court and on the record before his last sentencing. This overcomes all of Sexton’s claims, including his argument that the trial court erred in relying on an allegedly incomplete transcript of his 1997 sentencing to determine the basis of his original plea agreement.

AFFIRMED.

WARNER, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vorsteg v. Thomas
853 So. 2d 1102 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
853 So. 2d 1102, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12802, 2003 WL 22014706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sexton-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.