Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Sexton v. State

Sexton v. State

643 So. 2d 53, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9309, 1994 WL 523426
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 28, 1994
DocketNo. 94-03167
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 643 So. 2d 53 (Sexton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sexton v. State, 643 So. 2d 53, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9309, 1994 WL 523426 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks certiorari review of the circuit court’s order compelling him to provide reciprocal discovery of matters pertaining to the penalty phase of this capital case. He essentially contends that Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220 does not apply to the penalty phase of a trial. We disagree and concur with our sister court’s holding in Booker v. State, 634 So.2d 301 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

Petition denied.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bailey v. State
100 So. 3d 213 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Davis v. State
73 So. 3d 304 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
State v. Clark
644 So. 2d 556 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Sturge v. LCS Development Corp.
643 So. 2d 53 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
643 So. 2d 53, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9309, 1994 WL 523426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sexton-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.