Sexton v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
189 N.Y. 518
This text of 189 N.Y. 518 (Sexton v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sexton v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 189 N.Y. 518 (N.Y. 1907).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of McInerney v. D. & H. C. Co. (151 N. Y. 411) and Higgins v. W. U. Tel. Co. (156 N. Y. 75); no opinion.
Concur: O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Hisoock and Chase, JJ. Absent: Cullen, Ch. J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McInerney v. President, Managers & Co. of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.
45 N.E. 848 (New York Court of Appeals, 1897)
Higgins v. . Western Union Telegraph Co.
50 N.E. 500 (New York Court of Appeals, 1898)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
189 N.Y. 518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sexton-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-ny-1907.