Sexton v. . New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.

81 N.E. 1175, 189 N.Y. 518, 1907 N.Y. LEXIS 996
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 14, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 81 N.E. 1175 (Sexton v. . New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sexton v. . New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co., 81 N.E. 1175, 189 N.Y. 518, 1907 N.Y. LEXIS 996 (N.Y. 1907).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of McInerney v. D. H.C. Co. (151 N.Y. 411) and Higgins v. W.U. Tel.Co. (156 N.Y. 75); no opinion.

Concur: O'BRIEN, EDWARD T. BARTLETT, HAIGHT, WERNER, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ. Absent: CULLEN, Ch. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
134 A.D. 39 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 N.E. 1175, 189 N.Y. 518, 1907 N.Y. LEXIS 996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sexton-v-new-york-central-and-hudson-river-rd-co-ny-1907.