Sexton v. . New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.

81 N.E. 1175, 189 N.Y. 518, 1907 N.Y. LEXIS 996
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 14, 1907·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of McInerney v. D. H.C. Co. (151 N.Y. 411) and Higgins v. W.U. Tel.Co. (156 N.Y. 75); no opinion.

Concur: O'BRIEN, EDWARD T. BARTLETT, HAIGHT, WERNER, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ. Absent: CULLEN, Ch. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sexton v. . New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co., 81 N.E. 1175, 189 N.Y. 518, 1907 N.Y. LEXIS 996 (N.Y. 1907).

81 N.E. 1175 (Sexton v. . New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
134 A.D. 39 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)