Sexton v. KENTUCKY BAR ASS'N

253 S.W.3d 54, 2008 Ky. LEXIS 136, 2008 WL 2165470
CourtKentucky Supreme Court
DecidedMay 22, 2008
Docket2008-SC-000235-KB
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 253 S.W.3d 54 (Sexton v. KENTUCKY BAR ASS'N) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Kentucky Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sexton v. KENTUCKY BAR ASS'N, 253 S.W.3d 54, 2008 Ky. LEXIS 136, 2008 WL 2165470 (Ky. 2008).

Opinion

OPINION AND ORDER

Movant, Dean Lyle Sexton, KBA Member No. 82668, petitions this Court to enter an order permanently disbarring him from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky. The Movant was admitted to the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky on November 4, 1988, and his last known address is 7711 Stone Ledge Rd., Louisville, Kentucky 40291. Movant requests permanent disbarment for the numerous violations of the Kentucky Rules of Professional Conduct described below.

KBA FILE 7639

In 1999, Movant opened a new escrow account in addition to the one he had at Fifth Third Bank in Louisville, Kentucky. Movant began making deposits into the new escrow account and neglected to properly deposit funds into his previously existing escrow account, though he continued to write checks from the old account. Between July and September 1999, Movant wrote fifty-one (51) checks on his previously existing escrow account, resulting in fifty-one (51) overdrafts on that account.

As a result the above conduct, the KBA Inquiry Commission charged Movant with a violation of SCR 3.130-1.15(b) (failure to provide funds to a client) (Count I), and a violation of SCR 3.130-8.3(e) (dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation) (Count II). Movant admits that his conduct as described in Count I violates SCR 3.130-1.15(b), in that his gross negligence in maintaining his escrow account delayed delivery of funds to clients and third persons entitled to receive said funds. Mov- *55 ant, however, denies Count II, that his overdrafts were the result of dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation, and requests dismissal of that charge.

KBA FILE 8521

Movant handled closings and funding on mortgage loans for American Liberty Financial, Inc. (“American Liberty”), a mortgage broker. Beginning in early 2001, Movant became delinquent in his remittances to American Liberty after he had concluded several real estate closings. In May or June 2001, several weeks after Movant should have remitted payment, he brought his payments current.

In the summer of 2002, Movant abandoned his bar roster address and did not notify the Director of the Kentucky Bar Association of his change of address within thirty (30) days of the change. On July 16, 2002, Movant was personally served by the Jefferson County Sheriff with a copy of the underlying bar complaint in KBA file # 8521 and subsequently knowingly failed to respond to the complaint.

As a result of the above conduct, Movant was charged by the Inquiry Commission (by amended charge) with a violation of SCR 3.130-8.1(b) (failure to comply with request from a disciplinary authority) and SCR 3.175 (failure to timely notify KBA Director of change of address). Movant admits that his conduct violated SCR 3.130-8.1(b) and SCR 3.175.

KBA FILE 8617

Movant handled a real estate closing for a lender in June 1998 involving the purchase of a home by Frances Thomas from builder Don Kincaid. At the time of the closing, Movant overlooked the issue of the responsibility for, and payment of the 1998 property taxes. As a result, Ms. Thomas subsequently received a delinquent property tax notice. Movant thereafter obtained the funds from Mr. Kincaid to pay his pro-rata share of the 1998 property taxes. Movant did not pay these funds toward the taxes.

Movant also failed to record the deed that had been executed at the closing. Movant then prepared and recorded a newly executed second deed between the parties on September 22, 1998. At the second closing, Movant advised Ms. Thomas that in view of his error, he would pay her pro-rata share of the taxes, penalties and interest. Movant did not pay the taxes as promised.

Ms. Thomas sued Movant in the Oldham Circuit Court on August 14, 2001. Movant was served with the suit, but did not file an answer. The court entered a default judgment against the Movant on March 12, 2002 and thereafter held a bench trial on the issue of damages. Movant did not appear at trial. The court entered a judgment awarding Ms. Thomas $3,423.64 plus 12% interest.

During the investigation of this matter, Movant abandoned his bar roster address and did not notify the Director of the Kentucky Bar Association of his change of address within thirty (30) days of the change.

As a result of the above conduct, Movant was charged by the Inquiry Commission with violations of: SCR 3.130-4.4 (using means that have no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay or burden a third person) (Count I); SCR 3.130-1.15(b) (failure to provide funds to a client) (Count II); SCR 3.175 (failure to timely notify KBA Director of change of address) (Count III); and SCR 3.130-8.3(c) (dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation) (Count IV). Movant admits that his conduct violated SCR 3.130-4.4, SCR 3.130-1.15(b), SCR 3.175, and SCR 3.130-8.3(c).

*56 KBA FILE 9982

Leroy Mitchell hired Movant in late July 2002 to represent Mr. Mitchell in two legal matters. Mr. Mitchell paid Movant a total of $1,500.00 as a retainer fee on July 25, 2002. Mr. Mitchell filed a bar complaint against Movant relative to his representation of Mr. Mitchell. On November 14, 2002, Mr. Mitchell’s bar complaint was mailed to Movant’s listed bar address. However, Movant had changed his bar roster address without notifying the Director of the Kentucky Bar Association of his change of address within thirty (30) days of the change. As a result of his representation of Mr. Mitchell, Movant was charged by the KBA Inquiry Commission with various violations of the Kentucky Rules of Professional Conduct. The charges were thereafter amended to charge Movant only with a violation of SCR 3.175 (failure to timely notify KBA Director of change of address). Movant admits that his conduct constituted a violation of SCR 3.175.

KBA FILE 9991

Sarah LeBlanc hired Movant during the summer of 2000 to represent her in a dispute over an automobile accident. The matter was successfully settled in mediation in December 2001. Movant received a settlement check from the opposing party, payable to both Ms. LeBlanc and Movant. Ms. LeBlanc accompanied Movant to the bank on or about January 8, 2002 and cashed the check. Movant advised Ms. LeBlanc that he was going to pay the mediator’s fee. Movant took his fee from the check as well as $397.50 to pay the mediator’s fee. Movant did not pay the mediator’s fee. In May 2002, the mediator sued Ms. LeBlanc in Jefferson District Court for his fee of $397.50. Ms. LeBlanc paid the fee and the suit was dismissed. Ms. LeBlanc made several attempts to contact Movant regarding his breach of promise to pay the mediator and to seek return of the money. Ms. LeBlanc was unable to contact Movant. On November 14, 2002, Ms. LeBlanc’s bar complaint was mailed to Movant’s listed bar address. The mail was returned as Movant had changed his address. Movant failed to notify the Director of the Kentucky Bar Association of his change of address within thirty (30) days of the change.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Danny Perkins Butler v. Kentucky Bar Association
533 S.W.3d 687 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 2017)
Doan v. Kentucky Bar Association
276 S.W.3d 826 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
253 S.W.3d 54, 2008 Ky. LEXIS 136, 2008 WL 2165470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sexton-v-kentucky-bar-assn-ky-2008.