Sexton v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States
This text of 162 N.E. 559 (Sexton v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of Appellate Division and that of Special Term reversed, and motion for summary judgment denied, with costs in all courts, on the ground that there are questions of fact presented by the record which ought not to be determined on a motion for summary judgment.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ. Not sitting: Crane, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 N.E. 559, 248 N.Y. 646, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sexton-v-equitable-life-assurance-society-of-united-states-ny-1928.