Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Sexton v. Dillon

Sexton v. Dillon

247 A.D. 817
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 247 A.D. 817 (Sexton v. Dillon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sexton v. Dillon, 247 A.D. 817 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Order granting motion for an injunction pendente lite enjoining and restraining the defendants from using the word “ Regular ” in connection with the designation of Bernard J. Dillon and Mary O’Brien as candidates for members of State committee, Democratic party, fifth Assembly district, Kings county, affirmed. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dixon v. Corrigan
208 Misc. 911 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)
Thompson v. Cohen
179 Misc. 70 (New York Supreme Court, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 A.D. 817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sexton-v-dillon-nyappdiv-1936.