Sexsmith v. Chappell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Sexsmith v. Chappell

1913 OK 82, 130 P. 282, 35 Okla. 503, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 623

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 4, 1913

Docket4734

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK 82 (Sexsmith v. Chappell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sexsmith v. Chappell, 1913 OK 82, 130 P. 282, 35 Okla. 503, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 623 (Okla. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

WILLIAMS, J.

This proceeding in error seeks to have reviewed the judgment of the trial court adjudicating the title to the office of clerk of the superior court of Garfield county.

The same question involved in this case has this day been determined by this court in Beaty v. State ex rel. Lee, post, 130 Pac. 956, in favor of the contention of defendant in error.

The case is reversed and remanded, with instructions to grant a new trial, and to award the possession of the office of clerk of the superior court of 'Garfield county to the plaintiff in error.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI