Sexey (James) v. State
This text of Sexey (James) v. State (Sexey (James) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An unpublis 9- order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE QF NEVADA
JAMES CHRIS SEXEY, § No. 99939 Appellant VS, THE STATE OF NEVADA, g L
JAM—"Tum M—- i i ‘7 TRADE Pi, LlllefEP-AAM BL EUPHEME COURT
BV—J» . -—— . ORDER 131999199990 APPEAL Du»
This is a pro se appeal fmm a district caurt order denying a motion to obtain a cnpy of a sealed record on an order shortening. time. Eighth Judicial Diatrict Gaunt, Clark County; Susan Johnson, J udge.
Because no statute or enurt rulepermits an appeal from the
949, 359, 792 P.2d 1133, 1195(19991 Accordingly, we
I aforementioned decisien, we lack jurisdictinn. Cnsiilio U. State, 106 N99, ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
J, I \ , Jl Dauglas Cherry
co: Hen. Susan Johnson, District Judge James Chris Sexey Attnrney Generalfflarsnn City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Cnurt- Clerk
SUPREME Baum it»: Nievmn
. ((999439 r t I ‘ a I. ‘ I V. a V ‘
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sexey (James) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sexey-james-v-state-nev-2015.