Sewraz v. Guice

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 20, 2009
• Docket: 08-8173
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8173

CHETANAND KUMAR SEWRAZ,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

EDWARD GUICE, Lieutenant; SCOTT BAILEY, Detective; KATHERINE ATKINS, Evidence Technician; DARRIN EDWARD BROMSETH, Detective; CRAIG BROWN, Detective; JODY BRUNNER, Detective; JUANAMETTRE BUTLER, Officer; FRANK CARPENTER; JESSICA CHAMER, Evidence Technician,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00035-RLW)

Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 20, 2009

Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chetanand Kumar Sewraz, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Chetanand Kumar Sewraz appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without

prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Sewraz v. Guice, No. 3:08-cv-00035-RLW (E.D.

Va. Aug. 26, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED