Sewell W. Rouzer v. Harry E. Russell, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania
This text of 316 F.2d 736 (Sewell W. Rouzer v. Harry E. Russell, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
316 F.2d 736
Sewell W. ROUZER, Appellant,
v.
Harry E. RUSSELL, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania.
No. 14274.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Submitted April 25, 1963.
Decided May 9, 1963.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania; Frederick V. Follmer, Judge.
Sewell W. Rouzer, pro se.
Frank P. Lawley, Jr., Deputy Atty. Gen., Harrisburg, Pa. (Walter E. Alessandroni, Atty. Gen., Harrisburg, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Before KALODNER, HASTIE and GANEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court dismissing appellant's original petition with supplements for a writ of habeas corpus will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
316 F.2d 736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sewell-w-rouzer-v-harry-e-russell-superintendent-s-ca3-1963.