Home/Third Circuit/Sewell W. Rouzer v. Harry E. Russell, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania

Sewell W. Rouzer v. Harry E. Russell, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania

316 F.2d 736, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5323
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 10, 1963·No. 14195·Published

Opinion

316 F.2d 736

Sewell W. ROUZER, Appellant,
v.
Harry E. RUSSELL, Superintendent, State Correctional
Institution, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania.

No. 14195.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Submitted on Appellant's Brief, April 25, 1963.
Decided May 10, 1963.

Sewell W. Rouzer, pro se.

Frank P. Lawley, Jr., Deputy Atty. Gen., Harrisburg, Pa., for appellee.

Before KALODNER, HASTIE and GANEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court dated August 6, 1962 will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sewell W. Rouzer v. Harry E. Russell, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania, 316 F.2d 736, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5323 (3d Cir. 1963).

316 F.2d 736 (Sewell W. Rouzer v. Harry E. Russell, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.