Sewell v. Wagner
This text of 710 F. App'x 117 (Sewell v. Wagner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court’s orders dismissing this action for failure to state a claim and denying her motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Wagner, No. 8:16-cv-02458-GJH, 2016 WL 4051717, 2016 WL 10688817 (D. Md. July 27, Aug. 29, and Sept. 18, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
710 F. App'x 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sewell-v-wagner-ca4-2018.