Sewell v. Strayer University

Fourth Circuit

Sewell v. Strayer University

596 F. App'x 251

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 11, 2015

DocketNo. 14-2123

StatusPublished

This text of 596 F. App'x 251 (Sewell v. Strayer University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sewell v. Strayer University, 596 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s order denying her Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion and her motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Strayer Univ., No. 8:12-cv-02927-DKC, 2014 WL 1573638 (D.Md. Apr. 18, Sept. 18, Sept. 26, Oct. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s order denying her Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion and her motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Strayer Univ., No. 8:12-cv-02927-DKC, 2014 WL 1573638 (D.Md. Apr. 18, Sept. 18, Sept. 26, Oct. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

596 F. App'x 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sewell-v-strayer-university-ca4-2015.