Sewell v. Strayer University

Fourth Circuit

Sewell v. Strayer University

596 F. App'x 251

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 11, 2015·No. No. 14-2123·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s order denying her Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion and her motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Strayer Univ., No. 8:12-cv-02927-DKC, 2014 WL 1573638 (D.Md. Apr. 18, Sept. 18, Sept. 26, Oct. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s order denying her Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion and her motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Strayer Univ., No. 8:12-cv-02927-DKC, 2014 WL 1573638 (D.Md. Apr. 18, Sept. 18, Sept. 26, Oct. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Sewell v. Strayer University, 596 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

596 F. App'x 251 (Sewell v. Strayer University) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.