Sewell v. State

133 S.E. 268, 35 Ga. App. 395, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 390
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 12, 1926
Docket17262
StatusPublished

This text of 133 S.E. 268 (Sewell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sewell v. State, 133 S.E. 268, 35 Ga. App. 395, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 390 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence amply 'authorized the conviction of the accused, and the judge properly overruled' the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworbh, J., concur. J. 8. Galloway, Miles IF. Lewis, for plaintiff in error. Joseph B. Duke, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 S.E. 268, 35 Ga. App. 395, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sewell-v-state-gactapp-1926.