Sewell v. State

113 S.E. 45, 29 Ga. App. 47, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 41
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 25, 1922
Docket13707
StatusPublished

This text of 113 S.E. 45 (Sewell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sewell v. State, 113 S.E. 45, 29 Ga. App. 47, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 41 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

There is no merit in the only special ground of the motion for a new trial. There is some evidence to support the verdict, which is approved by the judge who tried the case. “ Whenever there is any evidence, however slight, to support a verdict which has been approved by the trial judge, this court is absolutely without authority to • control the judgment of the trial court.” Owens v. State, 27 Ga. App. 322 (108 S. E. 208).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Owens v. State
108 S.E. 208 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 S.E. 45, 29 Ga. App. 47, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sewell-v-state-gactapp-1922.