Sewell v. State

61 Ga. 496
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 15, 1878·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Bleckley, Justice.

The Code, in §4524, defines the offense for which [497] Sewell was tried and convicted, thus: “Forcible entry is the violently taking possession of lands and tenements with menaces, force and arms, and without authority of law.” The record shows that Sewell proceeded, under the provisions of the Code (§4077 et seq.,) to remove his tenant for holding over after the alleged expiration of his term. Affidavit was made in terms of the law, a warrant was duly issued, and a lawful officer executed the same by expelling the tenant, and delivering possession to Sewell, the landlord. It seems that the ground of the conviction was, that the affidavit was corruptly false in alleging that the term had expired. Grant that it was, the indictment and conviction should have been for perjury, not for a forcible entry. The entry was not with “ menaces, force and arms, and without authority of law,” but with lawful warrant, executed in a lawful way by a lawful officer.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sewell v. State, 61 Ga. 496 (Ga. 1878).

61 Ga. 496 (Sewell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Godwin v. Gibson's Products Co. of Albany, Inc.
172 S.E.2d 467 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Williford v. State
185 S.E. 611 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Dancik v. Rappold
109 Misc. 354 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1919)
Michael v. Bacon
63 S.E. 228 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Page v. Citizens Banking Co.
51 L.R.A. 463 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
Joiner v. Ocean Steamship Co.
86 Ga. 238 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1890)
Melson v. Dickson
63 Ga. 682 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1879)