Sewell v. Prince George's County Department of Social Services

Fourth Circuit

Sewell v. Prince George's County Department of Social Services

645 F. App'x 286

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 21, 2016

DocketNo. 15-2398

StatusPublished

This text of 645 F. App'x 286 (Sewell v. Prince George's County Department of Social Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sewell v. Prince George's County Department of Social Services, 645 F. App'x 286 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s orders denying as moot her motion for recusal and denying her motion for relief from judgment and motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Prince George’s County Dep’t of Soc. Servs., No. 8:12-cv-02522-DKC (D.Md. Oct. 21 & Nov. 2, 2015). The motions to transfer, for telephone conference, and for default and summary judgment are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s orders denying as moot her motion for recusal and denying her motion for relief from judgment and motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Prince George’s County Dep’t of Soc. Servs., No. 8:12-cv-02522-DKC (D.Md. Oct. 21 & Nov. 2, 2015). The motions to transfer, for telephone conference, and for default and summary judgment are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

645 F. App'x 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sewell-v-prince-georges-county-department-of-social-services-ca4-2016.