Sewell v. Prince George's County Department of Social Services

645 F. App'x 286
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 21, 2016·No. No. 15-2398·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s orders denying as moot her motion for recusal and denying her motion for relief from judgment and motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Prince George’s County Dep’t of Soc. Servs., No. 8:12-cv-02522-DKC (D.Md. Oct. 21 & Nov. 2, 2015). The motions to transfer, for telephone conference, and for default and summary judgment are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sewell v. Prince George's County Department of Social Services, 645 F. App'x 286 (4th Cir. 2016).

645 F. App'x 286 (Sewell v. Prince George's County Department of Social Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.