Sewell v. Prince George's County Department of Social Services

560 F. App'x 175
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 10, 2014·No. No. 13-2242·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s order denying, for want of jurisdiction, her Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order remanding this action to state court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Prince George’s Cnty. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., No. 8:12-cv-02402-DKC (D.Md. Oct. 1, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [176] the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sewell v. Prince George's County Department of Social Services, 560 F. App'x 175 (4th Cir. 2014).

560 F. App'x 175 (Sewell v. Prince George's County Department of Social Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.