Sewell v. Fidelity National Financial, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Sewell v. Fidelity National Financial, Inc.

669 F. App'x 159

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 6, 2016·No. No. 16-1739·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on her civil action for failure to state a claim, denying her motion for reconsideration, and imposing a prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Fidelty Nat’l Inc., No. 8:16-cv-00906-DKC, 2016 WL 1558378 (D. Md. Apr. 18, 2016; May 11, 2016; June 24, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on her civil action for failure to state a claim, denying her motion for reconsideration, and imposing a prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Fidelty Nat’l Inc., No. 8:16-cv-00906-DKC, 2016 WL 1558378 (D. Md. Apr. 18, 2016; May 11, 2016; June 24, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Sewell v. Fidelity National Financial, Inc., 669 F. App'x 159 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

669 F. App'x 159 (Sewell v. Fidelity National Financial, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.