Sewell v. Fidelity National Financial, Inc.

669 F. App'x 159
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 6, 2016
DocketNo. 16-1739
StatusPublished

This text of 669 F. App'x 159 (Sewell v. Fidelity National Financial, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sewell v. Fidelity National Financial, Inc., 669 F. App'x 159 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on her civil action for failure to state a claim, denying her motion for reconsideration, and imposing a prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Fidelty Nat’l Inc., No. 8:16-cv-00906-DKC, 2016 WL 1558378 (D. Md. Apr. 18, 2016; May 11, 2016; June 24, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
669 F. App'x 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sewell-v-fidelity-national-financial-inc-ca4-2016.