Sewell v. Dove Healthcare & Associated Industries Insurance Co.

857 So. 2d 265, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13584, 2003 WL 22080756
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 10, 2003
DocketNo. 1D02-2775
StatusPublished

This text of 857 So. 2d 265 (Sewell v. Dove Healthcare & Associated Industries Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sewell v. Dove Healthcare & Associated Industries Insurance Co., 857 So. 2d 265, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13584, 2003 WL 22080756 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

In the compensation order under review, the judge of compensation claims found the claimant permanently and totally, physically disabled, and awarded compensation payments accordingly, along with medical benefits for the physical sequelae of her slip and fall at work. Claimant appeals only the ruling that she did not prove that her industrial accident also caused her psychiatric problems.

Both psychiatrists who testified at the hearing reported that the claimant had suffered recurring depression beginning some decades before she fell. Dr. Weller attributed the claimant’s current depression to her industrial accident, while Dr. Forman testified that none of her psychiatric problems should be attributed to the slip and fall.

In denying the claim for psychiatric care, the judge of compensation claims expressly “reject[ed] the testimony of Dr. Weller,” and concluded that the claimant had not met her burden to prove causation by clear and convincing evidence. See § 440.09(1), Fla. Stat. (1999). This ruling has not been shown to be error. The judge of compensation claims was under no duty to explain his ruling more fully than he did. See Chavarria v. Selugal Clothing, Inc., 840 So.2d 1071 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

Affirmed.

BENTON and PADOVANO, JJ., concur; BROWNING, J., dissents with separate opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shaw v. Shaw
334 So. 2d 13 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
H & a Frank's Const., Inc. v. Mendoza
582 So. 2d 780 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Jackson v. Columbia Pictures
610 So. 2d 1349 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Chavarria v. Selugal Clothing, Inc.
840 So. 2d 1071 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
857 So. 2d 265, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13584, 2003 WL 22080756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sewell-v-dove-healthcare-associated-industries-insurance-co-fladistctapp-2003.