Sewell v. Conkle

Supreme Court of Georgia

Sewell v. Conkle

64 Ga. 436

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 15, 1879

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 64 Ga. 436 (Sewell v. Conkle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sewell v. Conkle, 64 Ga. 436 (Ga. 1879).

Pincite

Opinion

The writ of error must contain an assignment of tlie errors complained of ; otherwise, it will he dismissed. (R.)

Practice in the Supreme Court. September Term, 1S79.

The bill of exceptions in this case recited the proceedings had in the court below and the judgment rendered thereon. It then concluded thus: “Plaintiff, Sewell, tenders this his bill of exceptions, and prays that the same may be certified as true.” Counsel for defendant in error moved to dismiss the writ for want of any assignment of error. The court granted the motion, announcing the principle stated in the head-note.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The writ of error must contain an assignment of tlie errors complained of ; otherwise, it will he dismissed. (R.)

Practice in the Supreme Court. September Term, 1S79.

The bill of exceptions in this case recited the proceedings had in the court below and the judgment rendered thereon. It then concluded thus: “Plaintiff, Sewell, tenders this his bill of exceptions, and prays that the same may be certified as true.” Counsel for defendant in error moved to dismiss the writ for want of any assignment of error. The court granted the motion, announcing the principle stated in the head-note.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 Ga. 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sewell-v-conkle-ga-1879.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack