Sewell v. Chasanow

Fourth Circuit

Sewell v. Chasanow

678 F. App'x 176

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 8, 2017·No. No. 16-2294·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court’s orders dismissing this civil action and denying her motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Chasanow, No. 1:16-cv-03256-JKB, 2016 WL 6456387 (D. Md. Sept. 29, Oct. 7, Oct. 17 & Oct. 24, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court’s orders dismissing this civil action and denying her motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Chasanow, No. 1:16-cv-03256-JKB, 2016 WL 6456387 (D. Md. Sept. 29, Oct. 7, Oct. 17 & Oct. 24, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Sewell v. Chasanow, 678 F. App'x 176 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

678 F. App'x 176 (Sewell v. Chasanow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.