Seward v. City of Meridian

CourtDistrict Court, D. Idaho
DecidedMay 15, 2025
Docket1:25-cv-00221
StatusUnknown

This text of Seward v. City of Meridian (Seward v. City of Meridian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Idaho primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seward v. City of Meridian, (D. Idaho 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

COLT SEWARD, an individual, Case No. 1:25-cv-00221-BLW Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION v. AND ORDER

The CITY OF MERIDIAN, an Idaho municipality; CITY OF MERIDIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, a subsidiary of the City of Meridian; OFFICER DONALD HEIDA, individually; OFFICER SEAN MCDONALD, individually; and; DOES I through X, unknown individuals and/or entities,

Defendants.

INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Plaintiff Colt Seward’s Motion for Waiver of Bond (Dkt. 1). For the reasons explained below, the Court will deny the motion and instead set the bond amount at $50.00. The Court will also allow plaintiff to simply deposit $50 with the Court, rather than filing a bond, given the minimal amount. DISCUSSION Seward wishes to sue, among other defendants, Donald Heida and Sean McDonald, both of whom are alleged to be police officers with the City of Meridian. The plaintiff is required by Idaho Code § 6-601(2) to post a bond to cover costs that may be awarded against him when he initiates a suit against a law

enforcement officer. A court may, however, order partial payment of costs, fees, and security for prisoner plaintiffs who are indigent. See Idaho Code § 31-3220A. Seward has filed an affidavit claiming indigency. To summarize the

information contained there: He is currently incarcerated and earns $10 per week as a kitchen worker. He has no checking account, no savings account, no real property, and no personal property worth over $100. His inmate account statement reflects a balance of $258.32 as of April 9, 2025. He has no monthly living

expenses due to his incarceration. This filing would indicate that Mr. Seward could afford to pay a small bond amount—particularly because he doesn’t have any monthly living expenses. The

Court will therefore deny the motion and instead set bond in the nominal amount of $50. Granted, this amount wouldn’t cover litigation costs and expenses that Seward might be ordered to pay, but the purpose of the bond requirement is also to “ensure diligent prosecution of a civil action brought against a law enforcement

officer.” Idaho Code § 6-610(2). Accordingly, the Court finds it appropriate to set the bond in the amount of $50. Cf. Clements v. Pocatello Police Dep’t, No. 4:22- cv-00407-DCN, 2023 WL 2354894, at *2 n.2 (D. Idaho Mar. 2, 2023) (setting non-

prisoner, indigent plaintiff’s bond at $250). ORDER IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff's Motion to Waive Bond (Dkt. 1) is DENIED. (2) Plaintiff shall file a bond in the sum of $50.00 pursuant to Idaho Code § 6- 610 within 21 days. Alternatively, rather than filing a bond in this minimal amount, Plaintiff may comply with this Order by depositing $50 with the Court. AS DATED: May 15, 2025 soe] B. Lynn Winmill che U.S. District Court Judge

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - 3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 31
Idaho § 31
§ 6
Idaho § 6
§ 6-601
Idaho § 6-601(2)
§ 6-610
Idaho § 6-610(2)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Seward v. City of Meridian, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seward-v-city-of-meridian-idd-2025.