Sewall v. Weeks Moving & Storage Corp.
This text of 9 Misc. 2d 338 (Sewall v. Weeks Moving & Storage Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Notwithstanding the erroneous quotation of a lower rate, plaintiff was required to pay the minimum rate fixed by the tariffs duly filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission (Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Maxwell, 237 U. S. 94; Pennsylvania R. R. Co. v. Titus, 216 N. Y. 17, 22, 23; Willson v. American Ry. Express Co., 204 App. Div. 59, affd. 239 N. Y. 562).
The judgment should be unanimously reversed on the law and facts, without costs, and complaint dismissed, with appropriate costs in the court below. Appeal from order should be dismissed as academic.
Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ., concur..
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 Misc. 2d 338, 172 N.Y.S.2d 773, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sewall-v-weeks-moving-storage-corp-nyappterm-1957.