Sewall v. Tarbox
30 Me. 27
This text of 30 Me. 27 (Sewall v. Tarbox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sewall v. Tarbox, 30 Me. 27 (Me. 1849).
Opinion
— Where the plaintiff becomes nonsuit, a balance of an account in set-off cannot be allowed. The whole of the statute provisions must be taken into consideration, and they do not authorize such a judgment. As to the allowance of the set-off, the
Judgment is reversed, but not as to costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Samaha v. Samaha
18 App. D.C. 76 (D.C. Circuit, 1901)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
30 Me. 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sewall-v-tarbox-me-1849.