Sewall v. Mattoon

9 Mass. 535
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 15, 1813·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The object of an attachment on mesne pro cess is to compel the appearance of the defendant, * and to secure to the plaintiff the benefit of his judgmerit. When an officer attaches the debtor’s cattle, the debtor is bound to support them, after notice to him by the officer that they are attached. If he neglects to do it, and they perish from that cause, the loss will be his. They are at his risk. In case he is unable to furnish the necessary sustenance for them, he may procure some person, who will become responsible to the officer, that they shall be produced, when demanded to satisfy the execution that may issue. At any rate, the officer who attaches them is answerable to the creditor for them ; and his apprehension of incurring expense in their maintenance furnishes no excuse for his neglect. According to the agreement of the parties in this case, the defendant must be called, (a)

Defendant defaulted.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sewall v. Mattoon, 9 Mass. 535 (Mass. 1813).

9 Mass. 535 (Sewall v. Mattoon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beaulieu v. Clark
96 N.E. 319 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1911)
Baldwin v. Hatch
54 Me. 167 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1866)