Sewald v. Pyatt & Silvestri, Chtd.
This text of 37 F. App'x 320 (Sewald v. Pyatt & Silvestri, Chtd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
John Russell Sewald appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his action against defendant Pyatt and Silvestri alleging tortious interference with his attempts to discover who sent a piece of certified mail to defendant law firm.1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo and affirm the district court’s dismissal of Sewald’s action for failure to state a claim. See Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep’t, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir.1988).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 F. App'x 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sewald-v-pyatt-silvestri-chtd-ca9-2002.