Sevier v. Lowenthal
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
CHRIS SEVIER, Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 17-570 (RDM)
ALAN LOWENTHAL, U.S. Representative for California’s 47th Congressional District, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
For the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss, Dkt. 8, is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that the motion to intervene, Dkt. 5, is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint, Dkt. 25, is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to file an overlength reply in support of the motion to amend the Complaint, Dkt. 30, is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to file an overlength surreply to the motion to dismiss, Dkt. 32, is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that the motions for summary judgment filed by the proposed intervenors, Dkt. 34; Dkt. 47, are DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for a scheduling conference, Dkt. 36, is DENIED;
and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to strike, Dkt. 40, is DENIED; and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motions to supplement, Dkt. 41; Dkt. 46, are DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that the motions for leave to file amicus briefs filed by the National Alliance of Black Pastors, Dkt. 48, and Coalition of Doctors Defending Reparative Therapy, Dkt. 49, are GRANTED and that the briefs shall be deemed FILED; and it is further ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. This Order constitutes the final judgment of the Court within the meaning of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(a). SO ORDERED.
/s/ Randolph D. Moss
RANDOLPH D. MOSS
United States District Judge
Date: March 26, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sevier v. Lowenthal (Sevier v. Lowenthal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.