Severson v. Trump
This text of Severson v. Trump (Severson v. Trump) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3
4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 ALONZO JAMICHAEL SEVERSON, CASE NO. 2:25-cv-00992-JHC 8
ORDER 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 DONALD J TRUMP ET AL.,
12 Defendants. 13
14 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Alonzo Jamichael Severson’s motion for 15 leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), Dkt. # 1, and sua sponte. The Court GRANTS 16 Severson’s motion for leave to proceed IFP. 17 A complaint filed by a plaintiff proceeding IFP is subject to a mandatory sua sponte 18 review and the court “shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that . . . the action 19 or appeal—(i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; 20 or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. 21 § 1915(e)(2)(B); see Calhoun v. Stahl, 254 F.3d 845 (9th Cir. 2001) (“[T]he provisions of 28 22 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) are not limited to prisoners.”). 23 24 1 Severson’s complaint is essentially a copy of his complaint in a prior case that was 2 dismissed with prejudice. Compare Severson v. Trump Organization, 2:24-cv-01748-JLR, at 3 Dkt # 5 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 29, 2024), with Dkt. # 1-1. The only difference is that he has changed
4 the relief sought from five billion dollars to $35,100,000,000.1 “[A]n IFP complaint ‘that merely 5 repeats pending or previously litigated claims’ is subject to dismissal as frivolous.” Baize v. 6 Austin, 2016 WL 4127803, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2016) (citing Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 7 1103, 1105 n.2 (9th Cir. 1995)). 8 Thus, the Court DISMISSES Severson’s complaint with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 9 § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). 10 Dated this 30th day of May, 2025. 11 12 a John H. Chun 13 United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
1 He also adds a new Defendant, “New Trump Organization,” but the address for this entity is the 24 same as the address for “The Trump Organization.” Dkt. # 1-1 at 3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Severson v. Trump, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/severson-v-trump-wawd-2025.