Severs v. Abrahamson

124 N.W.2d 150, 255 Iowa 979, 1963 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 770
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedOctober 15, 1963
Docket51088
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 124 N.W.2d 150 (Severs v. Abrahamson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Severs v. Abrahamson, 124 N.W.2d 150, 255 Iowa 979, 1963 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 770 (iowa 1963).

Opinion

Thornton, J.

Plaintiff is a motor-vehicle fuel jobber. On April 30, 1962, he deposited his tax remittance for March in a United States mailbox in Des Moines. The envelope was postpaid and properly addressed. It bore a postage meter stamp dated April 30, 1962, at Des Moines, Iowa. No other postmark or cancellation appeared on the envelope. The envelope was received in the treasurer’s office May 2, 1962. The treasurer assessed a ten percent penalty under section 324.64, Code of Iowa, 1958, on the theory the remittance was not postmarked and therefore not filed on time under section 324.60, Code of Iowa, 1958.

Section 324.60, Code of Iowa, 1958, provides:

“The reports and remittances required under this chapter shall be deemed filed within the required time if postpaid, properly addressed and postmarked on or before midnight of the day on which due and payable. * *

The above section was enacted by the Fifty-seventh General Assembly in 1957. It is a known fact that postage meters had been in common business use long before that time. Congress first enacted legislation bearing on the use and handling of postage meters in 1920. Since then, pursuant to congressional authority, the postmaster general has promulgated *981 rules and regulations bearing on the use and handling of the postage meters and the mail run through them. We take judicial notice of such rules and regulations. Banks v. Carrell, 241 Iowa 786, 791, 43 N.W.2d 142. No one dealing with mail, or providing for use of the postal system, can be heard to say he did not intend the use to be in accord with post-office department rules and regulations and the Acts of Congress. Only Congress regulates the mails in this country. United States Constitution, Article I, section 8.

We think the General Assembly is charged with such knowledge in enacting section 324.60. It was enacted as a part of a comprehensive revision of the Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax Law, chapter 164, Fifty-seventh General Assembly. In the course of the enactment, section 324.67, the General Assembly provided for notices to licensees by registered mail on two occasions, and ordinary mail on one. That the General Assembly is familiar with restricted certified mail, see section 321.501, Code of Iowa, 1958.

Thirty billion pieces of metered mail are handled each year by the post-office department, 295,000 postage meter machines are in daily use. Charles Pomeroy Collins in his article, “The Validity of Postmarks”, in the April 1961 issue of the American Bar Association Journal, states metered mail represents forty-five percent of all mail and more than half of. all business mail. It seems the business community, comprised of those paying the type of tax we have here, finds postage meters expeditious and sufficient for their use.

We are required to construe words and phrases according to the context and the approved usage of the language, technical words and phrases according to their technical meaning. Section 4.1(2), Code of Iowa, 1962. Though “postmark” is peculiar to the mails it is a word commonly used and understood. It is not necessary to consider it as a technical word.

The most recent definition to come to our attention is in Webster’s Third International Dictionary. “Postmark” as a noun is there defined as, “an official postal marking on a piece of mail; specifically, a mark showing the name of the post.office *982 and the date and sometimes the hour of mailing and often serving as the actual and only cancellation.”

This definition includes both the meter stamp affixed by the sender and the postmark affixed by a post-office employee.

A meter stamp is considered a postmark in the following postal regulations:

“143.11. Use of Meter Stamps. You may pay postage by printing meter stamps with a postage meter on any class of mail. Metered mail is entitled to all the privileges and subject to all the conditions applying to the various classes of mail.”
“143.12. Benefits. Postage meters facilitate the purchase, control, and affixing of postage. Metered mail does not require facing, canceling, and postmarking in the post office, and can therefore be dispatched more quickly.”
“143.46. Date of Mailing. Meter stamps must show the date of mailing on all first-class mail, special delivery, special handling, or airmail; on all mail sent registered, insure, or COD; and when printed on separate tapes used on first-class mail. The month and year must be shown on tapes on second, third and fourth-class mail, but the day may be omitted. When tapes are not used the date may not be shown in meter stamps on second, third or fourth-class mail.”
“143.47. Hour of Mailing. The hour of mailing may be shown only on first-class, air, or special delivery mail, and then only when it is mailed in time to be dispatched at the hour shown.”
“324.563. Postmarking. Do not postmark metered mail, except registered mail which must be postmarked on the back and meter reply mail. See 324.566 for treatment when wrong date or hour appears in meter stamp. Any irregularities in mailing shall be noted and brought to the attention of the license holder.”
“324.566. Wrong Date. Run metered mail bearing the wrong date or hour of mailing through the canceling machine or otherwise postmark to show the proper date and hour and dispatch. Use POD Form 3611 to call the irregularity to the attention of the mailer. If the irregularity is repeated, inform *983 the head of the firm rather than the office employee who prepares the matter for mailing. If a mailer disregards sneh notices and frequently presents mail bearing an incorrect date or hour, you may turn the mail back with instructions to enclose in new envelopes bearing the correct date and hour, if any, in the meter stamp.”
“143.15. Control. After a meter has been delivered to you, you must keep it in your custody until turned over to the authorized manufacturer or to the post office. Tampering with or misuse of a meter is punishable by law.”
“143.82(f). The meter die must include a postmark to print the name of the city and State from which mail is dispatched and the date of mailing. The postmark must be printed at the left of but adjacent to the denomination stamp and may be either included in an overall design with the denomination stamp or separated from it. Provision must be made so that the date may be either printed or omitted as required by the Post Office Department on the various classes of mail. Provision may be made to print an hour of mailing either within or in a close position outside the postmark. Provision may also be made to print designations such as ‘Non-profit Org.’, and the like, adjacent to and in the same operation with the meter stamp. The denomination die must not be completely exposed at any time during the process of installing or removing postmark dies, daters, hour type, or special designation slugs or when changing the date.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Luana Savings Bank v. John Eveland
Court of Appeals of Iowa, 2022
Lozier Corp. v. Douglas Cty. Bd. of Equal.
829 N.W.2d 652 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2013)
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Department of Revenue
2007 WY 43 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2007)
Abrams v. Ohio Pacific Express
819 S.W.2d 338 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1991)
United States v. Charles T. Maude
481 F.2d 1062 (D.C. Circuit, 1973)
Socony Vacuum Oil Company v. State
170 N.W.2d 378 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1969)
Kenkel v. Iowa State Highway Commission
162 N.W.2d 762 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1968)
Hueske Implement Company v. Shipley
445 P.2d 9 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 N.W.2d 150, 255 Iowa 979, 1963 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/severs-v-abrahamson-iowa-1963.